01
Select repository scope
Index only the repositories, branches and supporting documents approved for the team.
Output
Versioned code context
All use cases
Detailed workflow · Software teams
Repository-aware assistance inside the engineering boundary.
Use source code, architecture notes and issue history for explanation, test preparation and review without turning proprietary code into a public-chat prompt history.
Faster orientation and review preparation; engineers still run, inspect and own the change.
Local route
Typical source material
Operating controls
Output
Typical source material
01Source repositories
02Architecture decisions
03Issue and incident exports
04Runbooks and API specifications
Questions worth asking
- ?Where is this behaviour implemented?
- ?Which dependency and tests are affected?
- ?What does the migration need to preserve?
- ?Which assumption conflicts with the architecture record?
Working pattern
A controlled path from source to reviewed output.
02
Trace before proposing
Locate definitions, call sites, tests and architecture constraints before generating a change plan.
Output
Evidence-backed plan
03
Prepare a bounded change
Draft tests, review notes or a patch limited to the approved task and repository state.
Output
Inspectable diff
04
Run engineering controls
Engineers run tests, static analysis, security review and human code review before merge.
Output
Team-owned decision
Operating controls
The controls are part of the product.
- Repository and branch allowlist
- Secrets excluded before indexing
- Generated changes remain uncommitted by default
- Test and review gates unchanged
- Model and context revision recorded for evaluations
Pilot measures
Measure usefulness and failure together.
Trace
Time to locate the responsible module
Review
Useful issues found before human review
Pass
Generated test drafts accepted after editing
Leak
Secrets or excluded paths entering the index
Explicit limits
What this workflow does not do.
×No autonomous merge or deployment
×No indexing of secrets or production dumps
×No bypass of licence and dependency review
×No assumption that generated code is secure
Map this workflow to your office.
Tell us the document volume, users and review expectations. We will define the appliance, model and storage envelope before configuration.